It
would seem there's no topic worthy of addressing that would
not bore our patient readers, after the Round Table program
of June 12, which dealt with the new edition of a book
published in Bolivia 15 years ago, featuring now a prologue
I wrote. During this program, an introduction was also read
written at a later date by Evo Morales and a message from
the prestigious Argentinean writer Stella Calloni, to be
included in an upcoming edition. I had carefully chosen the
information I used for that prologue.
A powerful internationalist spirit, which had its
roots in the broad contingent of Cuban combatants who
participated in the anti-fascist struggle of the Spanish
people and made the best traditions of the world worker's
movement its own, had developed in Cuba in the first years
of the Revolution.
We are not in the habit of publicizing our
cooperative efforts with other peoples, but it is at times
impossible to prevent the press from mentioning it. Our
cooperative efforts stem from profound feelings that have
nothing to do with a desire for publicity.
Some ask themselves how it is possible for a small
country with scarce resources to carry out tasks of such
magnitude in fields as decisive as education and health,
without which contemporary society is unthinkable.
Humanity developed the goods and services essential
to its existence since establishing its first society, and
the latter has in turn developed from the most elementary to
the most sophisticated of forms over many thousands of
years.
The exploitation of man by man was inseparable from
this development, as we all know or ought to know.
The different ways in which this reality has been
perceived have always depended on the place each of us
occupies within society. For long, exploitation was seen as
something natural and the immense majority was never aware
of the above relation.
At the very height of capitalist development in
England, which was a world leader, next to the United States
and other countries in Europe, in a world that was already
dominated by colonialism and expansionism, a great thinker
and history and economics scholar, Karl Marx, on the basis
of the ideas of the most prestigious German philosophers and
economists of the time –including Hegel, Adam Smith and
David Ricardo, with whom he disagreed– elaborated, wrote and
published his ideas on capitalism’s relations of production
and exchange in 1859 in a work titled Contribution to the
Critique of Political Economy. In 1867, he continued to
spread his ideas with the publication of the first volume of
his most important work, a work that made him famous: The
Capital. Most of the long book, on the basis of Marx’s notes
and comments, was edited by Engels, who shared Marx’s ideas
and, like a prophet, spread his work after Marx’s death in
1883.
What Marx published constitutes the most serious
analysis ever to be written about class society and the
exploitation of man by man. Marxism had thus been born, as
the foundation of revolutionary parties and movements that
proclaimed socialism as their objective, including nearly
all social-democratic parties that, when World War I broke
out, betrayed the slogan proclaimed by Marx and Engels in
The Communist Manifesto, first published in 1848: "Workers
of the world, unite!”
One of the truths that this great thinker expressed
in simple terms was that: “In
the social production during their lives, men establish
certain necessary relations independent of their wills,
relations of production which correspond to a given phase of
development of their material productive forces. It is not
man’s consciousness which determines its being, but on the
contrary, it is its social being which determines its
consciousness. On reaching a given phase of development,
society's material productive forces come into contradiction
with existing production relations...From forms of
development of the productive forces, these relations become
obstacles to the latter and an era of social revolution thus
begins...No social formation disappears before its
productive forces are fully developed and no new and more
advanced production relations emerge before the material
conditions for their existence have matured within the old
society".
I could not find better words to more clearly and
precisely express these concepts elaborated by Marx,
concepts whose essence, with a basic explanation from a
teacher, even one of the young Cubans who joined the Young
Communists League this past Saturday June 14th
could understand.
To describe the concrete development of the class
struggle, Marx wrote The Class Struggle in France from 1848
to 1850 and the 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte,
two excellent historical analyses that delight any reader.
He was a true genius.
Lenin, a profound continuator of dialectical
thought and Marx’s research, wrote two key works: The State
and Revolution and Imperialism: the Highest Stage of
Capitalism. Marx’s ideas, put into practice by Lenin through
the October Revolution, were also developed by Mao Zedong
and other Third World revolutionary leaders. Without them,
the Cuban Revolution would not have taken place in the
United States’ backyard.
Had Marxist thought simply limited itself to the
idea that "no social formation disappears before its
productive forces are fully developed", the capitalist
theoretician Francis Fukuyama would have been right in
proclaiming that the collapse of the Soviet Union marked the
end of history and ideologies and that all resistance to the
capitalist system of production should cease.
When the founder of scientific socialism published
his ideas, society’s productive forces were far from fully
developed. Technology had not yet yielded deadly weapons of
mass destruction capable of exterminating the human species;
the aerospatial domain did not yet exist, nor did the
unlimited squandering of hydrocarbons and non-renewable
fossil fuels; climate change had not yet been detected in a
natural world whose potential seemed infinite to humanity,
nor had the world food crisis, to be borne by innumerable
combustion engines and a population six times larger than
that which inhabited the planet on the year Marx was born
(then of one billion), made itself known yet.
Cuba's socialist experience takes place at a time
when imperial domination has expanded across the globe.
When I speak of consciousness I am not referring to
a will capable of changing reality but, on the contrary, to
knowledge of objective reality which can determine the path
to follow.
Tens of million of people died in the war sparked
off in the mid 20th century by fascism, an
ideology which was new at the time, born in the anti-Marxist
bosom of the developed capitalist world Lenin had foretold.
In Cuba, as in other Third World countries, the
struggle for national liberation, under the leadership of
the middle classes and petite bourgeoisie, and the struggle
for socialism that the most advanced sectors of the working
class and farmers had been waging over the years, combined
and strengthened one another. Ideological and class
contradictions also flourished. Objective and subjective
factors varied considerably from one process to another.
The United Nations and other international
organizations, where many saw the beginning of a new,
international consciousness, emerged from the last world
war. Those hopes were betrayed.
Fascism, whose instrument Hitler called the
National Socialist Party, was re-born, more powerful and
threatening than ever.
The empire deploys and keeps aircraft carriers in
all of the world's seas, ever ready for military
intervention. What does it decide to do in order to compete
with Cuba in our hemisphere? To deploy an enormous ship
turned into a floating hospital that works ten days in each
country. It can assist a number of people daily but it
cannot solve a country's problems. It does not compensate
for the brain-drain, and it cannot train the specialists who
are needed so that real medical services may be offered on
any day of the week and year. All of the world's aircraft
carriers, which today are instruments of military
intervention deployed across the world's oceans, working as
hospitals, could not offer those services to the millions of
people treated by Cuban doctors in remote corners of the
planet, where women go into labor, children are born and
there are sick people in urgent need of attention.
Our country has demonstrated that it can stand up
to all pressures and help other peoples.
I was thinking about our cooperative efforts, not
only in Bolivia, but in Haiti, the Caribbean, several
countries in Central America, South America, Africa and even
distant Oceania, 20 thousand kilometers away. I also
recalled the missions undertaken by the Henry Reeve Brigade,
which responded to serious emergencies, traveling in our
planes, transporting personnel and other resources.
We are not far from reaching the figure of one
million people annually operated on for sight problems, free
of charge. Can the United States really compete with Cuba?
We will make use of computers, not to create
weapons of mass destruction and exterminate people but to
convey knowledge to other peoples. From the economic point
of view, the development of the intelligence and conscience
of our fellow citizens, made possible by the Revolution,
allow us not only to aid those in most need at no cost to
us, but also to export specialized services, including
healthcare services, to countries that have more resources
than our own. In this field, the United States will never be
able to compete with Cuba.
Our small country shall continue to hold its
ground.
In one phrase: The ant has proved mightier than the
elephant!
Fidel
Castro Ruz
June
18, 2008
7:35
p.m.